Why Feedback Is Often Misleading in Corporate Careers

Most professionals receive feedback.
Very few receive clarity.

Over the years, I have seen many capable, hardworking professionals struggle with the same quiet confusion. They are told they are doing well. Their performance reviews are positive. Their managers appear supportive. Yet, year after year, their careers remain oddly static.

Feedback exists. Progress does not.

This disconnect is not accidental. It is structural.

The Comfort of Positive Feedback

In my experience, most feedback in organizations is not designed to accelerate growth. It is designed to preserve stability.

When a manager tells someone, “You are doing well,” what they often mean is that the person is reliable, meeting expectations, and not creating friction. These are valuable qualities. They are also qualities that keep the system functioning smoothly.

I have seen feedback used far more often to confirm that someone fits well where they are, rather than to prepare them for what comes next. Encouraging words maintain harmony. Difficult explanations introduce discomfort. Most systems choose harmony.

In an earlier post on why hardworking professionals do not get promoted as fast as they expect, I explored how effort alone often reinforces the status quo instead of changing it. Feedback plays a similar role. It rewards what keeps things stable, not what enables movement.

👉 Interlink here:
https://squarecutinsights.com/why-hardworking-professionals-dont-get-promoted-as-fast-as-they-expect/

Feedback Looks Backward. Careers Move Forward.

One of the most persistent misunderstandings I have observed is the assumption that feedback and career growth operate on the same timeline. They do not.

Feedback evaluates past performance. Career progression evaluates future readiness.

This distinction is rarely articulated clearly. As a result, people assume that strong feedback today is a signal of opportunity tomorrow. In reality, it often confirms only that they are effective in their current role.

Being good at what someone does today does not automatically mean they are ready for what comes next. Feedback rarely addresses that gap explicitly, and silence is often misinterpreted as approval.

The Injustice of Incomplete Feedback

One of the biggest injustices I have seen in corporate environments is not inaccurate feedback, but incomplete feedback.

Telling someone what they are doing well is easy. Telling someone what separates them from the next level requires clarity, courage, and competence. Many managers are simply not equipped to have that conversation.

I once worked with a high-performing manager who received “exceeds expectations” ratings for three consecutive years. When a senior role opened up, he was not even considered. The reason had nothing to do with performance. No one had ever told him that stakeholder influence, not execution, was the real gap.

Encouragement had replaced direction. Effort had continued. Expectations had remained undefined.

Feedback Versus Career Development Plans

Over time, I have noticed that organizations often speak about feedback and career development plans as if they are interchangeable. They are not.

Feedback explains performance. A career development plan should explain trajectory.

A meaningful career development plan makes one thing explicit: the gap between where someone is today and what the next level actually requires. It provides language, context, and direction.

In many organizations, career development plans exist formally. Whether they are actively used as developmental tools or treated as procedural checkboxes is another matter. Feedback continues to flow generously. Direction does not.

Domain Expertise and the Illusion of Readiness

Another pattern I have repeatedly observed is the way organizations conflate domain expertise with overall readiness.

When someone holds a skill that is critical to the business or the client, feedback often reflects dependency rather than development. The individual may be delivering exceptionally well within a narrow scope, while gaps in broader competence remain unspoken.

I have seen people receive consistently positive feedback because the business could not afford to lose them, not because they were well-rounded for the next level.

Being indispensable in a role can feel like growth. In reality, it often delays the conversations that matter most.

Feedback, Coaching, and Mentoring Are Not the Same

Another reason feedback fails to drive career growth is the way organizations collapse different conversations into the same language.

Feedback, coaching, and mentoring serve different purposes.

Feedback evaluates performance. Coaching builds capability. Mentoring shapes perspective and long-term direction.

Expecting feedback alone to help someone move up the ladder is unrealistic. I have rarely seen meaningful career progression without some form of coaching or mentoring. Unfortunately, good coaches and mentors are rare.

Many managers are effective operators. Far fewer are skilled at developing people for roles they themselves may never have held.

The Myth of Democratic Development

In the interest of fairness, organizations often attempt to distribute feedback evenly. Development, however, is rarely even.

Career acceleration requires focus, sponsorship, time, and honest conversations. These resources are limited. When development conversations are spread thinly across everyone, the people with the highest potential often receive the same generic feedback as everyone else.

Fairness of feedback does not guarantee fairness of opportunity.

Closing Reflection

Feedback is often sincere. It is rarely sufficient.

It tells people how well they are functioning today, not how ready they are for tomorrow. Without clarity about the distance between the two, effort becomes misdirected.

Most professionals I have worked with were not held back by a lack of hard work. They were held back by feedback that answered the wrong question — How am I doing? — instead of the more important one: What must change for me to move forward?